New Delhi, Oct 9 (IANS) The Supreme Court on Monday held that video conferencing cannot be mandated in pleas seeking transfer of proceedings.The court also made reference to Section 11 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, which mandates the proceedings to be held in camera if Family court or one of the parties so desires.In a dissenting judgment, Justice Chandrachud strongly urged the use of technology in such proceedings Proper adoption of video conferencing does not negate the postulates of an in-camera trial even if such a trial is required by the court or by one of the parties under Section 11, he said.It would be inappropriate to deprive the Family Court which is vested with such wide powers and procedural flexibility to adopt video conferencing as a facilitative tool, where it is convenient and readily available. Chandrachud dissented.A three bench of the apex court said in matrimonial disputes, the spatial distance China Electric Paint Spray Guns Suppliers while conducting settlement through video conferencing will distant the possibility of reconciliation because the Family Court Judge would not be in a position to interact with the parties in the manner as the law commands.